Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-07T21:58:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If we were to fix ONLY the vxid issue in 9.1 as you were advocating
>
> Sensible debate is impossible when you don't read what I've written.

I've read every word you've written on this thread.  Much of it,
multiple times.  I am unclear what we are arguing about.  I don't want
to have a debate.  I want to figure out what works, and do it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company