Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-07T21:58:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> If we were to fix ONLY the vxid issue in 9.1 as you were advocating > > Sensible debate is impossible when you don't read what I've written. I've read every word you've written on this thread. Much of it, multiple times. I am unclear what we are arguing about. I don't want to have a debate. I want to figure out what works, and do it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company