Horton

Re: pgindent weirdness

Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>

View thread
From: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-04-20T17:03:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Latest consolidated typedef list from buildfarm.

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:

>> So in the case at hand, we actually *need* to remove the "struct" from
>> RelationGetBufferForTuple's declaration, so that BulkInsertStateData
>> gets used as a typedef name in that way.

Since the general form seems to be to declare things as:
   typedef struct foo { ... } foo;

Is there any reason why we see any struct foo in the sources other
than in the typedef line?

"Legacy" and "invasive patch" are good enough reasons, if they are it...

a.


-- 
Aidan Van Dyk                                             Create like a god,
aidan@highrise.ca                                       command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/                                   work like a slave.