Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Jignesh Shah <jkshah@gmail.com>
From: Jignesh Shah <jkshah@gmail.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-06-06T19:54:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >> That's an improvement of about ~3.5x. According to the vmstat output, >> when running without the patch, the CPU state was about 40% idle. >> With the patch, it dropped down to around 6%. > > Wow! That's fantastic. > > Jignesh, are you in a position to test any of Robert's work using DBT or > other benchmarks? > > -- > Josh Berkus > PostgreSQL Experts Inc. > http://pgexperts.com > I missed the discussion. Can you send me the patch (will that work with 9.1 beta?)? I can do a before and after with DBT2 and let you know. And also test it with sysbench read test which also has a relation locking bottleneck. Thanks. Regards, Jignesh