Re: pg_dump --binary-upgrade vs. ALTER TYPE ... DROP ATTRIBUTE
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-04-21T02:02:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix pg_dump to handle collations applied to columns of composite types.
- acfa1f45ed3e 9.1.0 cited
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 01:10:19PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:36:14PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:58:30AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote: >> >> >> When we're done with the relkind-restriction patch, I'll post a new version of >> >> >> this one. ?It will remove the circularity check and add a relkind check. >> >> > >> >> > Here it is. ?Changes from tt1v1-alter-of.patch to tt1v2-alter-of.patch: >> >> > * Use transformOfType()'s relkind check in ATExecAddOf() >> >> > * Remove circularity check >> >> > * Open pg_inherits with AccessShareLock >> >> > * Fix terminology in ATExecDropOf() comment >> >> > * Rebase over pgindent changes >> >> > >> >> > Changes from tt2v1-binary-upgrade.patch to tt2v2-binary-upgrade.patch: >> >> > * Rebase over dumpCompositeType() changes from commit acfa1f45 >> >> >> >> I think there's a bug in the tt1v1 patch. ?I'm getting intermittent >> >> regression test failures at this point: > > It neglected to call CatalogUpdateIndexes(); attached new version fixes that. > The failure was intermittent due to HOT; stubbing out HeapSatisfiesHOTUpdate() > with "return false" made the failure appear every time. > > Thanks for the failure data. Thanks for the patch! I've now committed this part; the actual fix for pg_dump is still outstanding. I am not too in love with the syntax you've chosen here, but since I don't have a better idea I'll wait and see if anyone else wants to bikeshed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company