Thread

Re: heap_hot_search_buffer refactoring

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2011-06-19T18:16:43Z

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 10:50 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 14:03 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > The attached patch refactors heap_hot_search_buffer() so that
>> > index_getnext() can use it, and modifies index_getnext() to do so.
>>
>> Attached is a version of the patch that applies cleanly to master.
>
> In heap_hot_search_buffer:
>
>  +       /* If this is not the first call, previous call returned
>             a (live!) tuple */
>          if (all_dead)
>  -               *all_dead = true;
>  +               *all_dead = !first_call;
>
> I think that's a typo: it should be:
>
>  +               *all_dead = first_call;

Yikes.  I think you are right.  It's kind of scary that the regression
tests passed with that mistake.

New patch attached, with that one-line change.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company