Re: Review: psql include file using relative path
Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
From: Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
To: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-06T00:16:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- psql_ir.patch (text/x-patch) patch
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Tweaks applied, but omitted the C variable names as I don't think that > adds > > much value. > > Your rewordings are fine, but the the article "the" is missing in a > few spots, e.g. > * "uses \ir command" -> "uses the \ir command" > * "to currently processing file" -> "to the currently processing file" > * "same as \i command" -> "same as the \i command" > > I think "processing" is better (and consistent with the rest of the > comments) than "processed" here: > + * the file from where the currently processed file (if any) is located. > > > New version of the patch attached. Thanks for the review. > > I think the patch is in pretty good shape now. The memory leak is gone > AFAICT, and the comments and documentation updates look good. > Attached an updated patch. If you find it ready for committer, please mark it so in the commitfest app. Thanks, -- Gurjeet Singh EnterpriseDB Corporation The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company