Re: gcc 4.6 and hot standby

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 14:24, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> writes:

>> Hrm, Couldn't we change all the references to tmpRecPtr to use RecPtr
>> instead? (Except of course where we assign RecPtr = &tmpRecPtr); I
>> think that would make the code look a lot less confused. Something
>> like the attached?
>
> Yeah, we could do that too; slightly modified version of your change
> included in the attached.

A cassert enabled build seems to be working, ill leave it running over
the weekend...