Horton

Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-04-05T08:21:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> The attached patch merges synchronous_replication into synchronous_commit.
>> Committed
>
> Without discussion?  I would think that this patch is stepping on the
> other one toes and that maybe would need to make a decision about sync
> rep behavior before to commit this change.

Hmm.. I think that we reached the consensus about merging two GUCs
in previous discussion. You argue that synchronization level should be
controlled in separate two parameters?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center