Horton

Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-08T16:44:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> As a result of this, I've been insulted, told I have no respect for
> process and even suggested there was a threat of patch war.

Well, you've pretty much said flat out you don't like the process, and
you don't agree with having a firm feature freeze.  I think it's a
perfectly legitimate question to ask whether we're going to have to
continually relitigate that point.  This is at least the second major
dust-up on this point since the end of 9.1CF4, and there were some
smaller ones, too.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company