Horton

Re: time-delayed standbys

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-07-01T00:15:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Some actions aren't even transactional, such as DROP DATABASE, amongst
>
> Good point.  We'd probably need to add a timestamp to the drop
> database record, as that's a case that people would likely want to
> defend against with this feature.

This means that recovery_target_* code would also need to deal with
DROP DATABASE case.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center