Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-07-20T14:52:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On 11 Jan 2023, at 15:44, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:43 AM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm attaching the v22 patch set for further review.
> 
> Needed a rebase due to 216a784829c2c5f03ab0c43e009126cbb819e9b2.
> Attaching v23 patch set for further review.

This thread has stalled for well over 6 months with the patch going from CF to
CF.  From skimming the thread it seems that a lot of the details have been
ironed out with most (all?) objections addressed.  Is any committer interested
in picking this up?  If not we should probably mark it returned with feedback.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




Commits

  1. Perform apply of large transactions by parallel workers.

  2. Enhance pg_log_backend_memory_contexts() for auxiliary processes.

  3. Allow GRANT on pg_log_backend_memory_contexts().

  4. Move Perl test modules to a better namespace

  5. Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods

  6. Add backtrace support for error reporting