Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread
Jeremy Schneider <schneider@ardentperf.com>
From: Jeremy Schneider <schneider@ardentperf.com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2025-11-12T23:51:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add rudimentary table prioritization to autovacuum.
- d7965d65fc5b 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Trigger more frequent autovacuums with relallfrozen
- 06eae9e6218a 18.0 cited
-
Harden nbtree page deletion.
- c34787f91058 14.0 cited
-
Check for interrupts inside the nbtree page deletion code.
- 3a01f68e35a3 12.0 cited
> On Nov 12, 2025, at 5:10 PM, Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> I do think re-prioritization is worth considering, but IMHO we should leave >> it out of phase 1. I think it's pretty easy to reason about one round of >> prioritization being okay. The order is completely arbitrary today, so how >> could ordering by vacuum-related criteria make things any worse? > > While it’s true that the current table order is arbitrary, that arbitrariness > naturally helps distribute vacuum work across tables of various sizes > at a given time > > The proposal now is by design forcing all the top bloated table, that > will require more I/O to vacuum to be vacuumed at the same time, > by all workers. Users may observe this after they upgrade and wonder > why their I/O profile changed and perhaps slowed others non-vacuum > related processing down. They also don't have a knob to go back to > the previous behavior. > > Of course, this behavior can and will happen now, but with this > prioritization, we are forcing it. > > Is this a concern? It’s still possible to tune the cost delay, the number of autovacuum workers, etc - if someone needs to manage too much autovacuum I/O concurrency and dialing it back down a little bit. I think that’s sufficient -Jeremy