Re: Online enabling of checksums

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org,Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>,Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>,Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>,Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-04-05T20:27:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On April 5, 2018 1:20:52 PM PDT, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:14 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
>wrote:
>
>And even worse, without even announcing an intent to commit and giving
>> people a chance to object.
>>
>
>At least this patch was posted on the lists before commit, unlike many
>others from many different people. And AFAIK there has never been such
>a
>rule.

The more debatable a decision is, the more important it IMO becomes to give people a chance to object. Don't think there needs to be a hard rule to always announce an intent to commit.

Andres
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


Commits

  1. Online enabling and disabling of data checksums

  2. Deactive flapping checksum isolation tests.

  3. Add support for coordinating record typmods among parallel workers.