Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects

Kumar, Sachin <ssetiya@amazon.com>

From: "Kumar, Sachin" <ssetiya@amazon.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jacob Champion <champion.p@gmail.com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-11-13T15:06:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

> On 09/11/2023, 18:41, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us <mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>> wrote:
> Um ... you didn't attach the patch?

Sorry , patch attached

Regards
Sachin


Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Count individual SQL commands in pg_restore's --transaction-size mode.

  2. Reduce number of commands dumpTableSchema emits for binary upgrade.

  3. Invent --transaction-size option for pg_restore.

  4. Rearrange pg_dump's handling of large objects for better efficiency.

  5. Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints

  6. Fix typo and case in messages