Re: SR slaves and .pgpass

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>

Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2010-06-14T02:56:15Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 09/06/10 08:24, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> There is precedent for .pgpass being a bit ambiguous. See the way
>>> "localhost" is used.
>>
>> OK. The attached patch allows us to use "replication" in the database
>> field of the .pgpass file, for the replication connection.
>
> Thanks, committed with some rewording of the docs and comments. I hope I
> made them better, not worse.

I could confirm that this has been committed via git log, but not find
the related post on the pgsql-committers. Is there a problem in the
mailing-list?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center