Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>

Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2010-06-09T01:51:59Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Takahiro Itagaki
<itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> >> I prefer archive_cleanup_command. We should name things after their
>> >> principal function, not an implementation detail, IMNSHO.
>> >
>> > Weak preference for archive_cleanup_command here.
>>
>> OK, sounds like we have consensus on that.  Who wants to do it?
>
> Do we just need to replace all of them? If so, patch attached.
> I replaced 3 terms: recovery_end_command, recovery-end-command,
> and recoveryEndCommand.

I think we're replacing restartpoint_command, not recovery_end_command.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company