Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-05-06T04:32:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > If someone wants to suggest that HS is useless if max_standby_delay > supports only boolean values, I am ready to suggest we remove HS as well > and head to 9.0 because that would suggest that HS itself is going to be > useless. I think HS is going to be a lot less useful than many people think, at least in 9.0. But I think ripping out max_standby_delay will make it worse. > The code will not be thrown away; we will bring it back for 9.1. If that's the case, then taking it out makes no sense. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company