Re: Explicit psqlrc
gabrielle <gorthx@gmail.com>
From: gabrielle <gorthx@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com>, David Christensen <david@endpoint.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-06-21T23:51:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 14:50 -0400, Alvaro Herrera asked: > How does it play with ON_ERROR_STOP/ROLLBACK? With ON_ERROR_STOP=ON, psql issues an error when it encounters one, stops processing the file that contains the error, and then continues to process any remaining files. I'm still investigating ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK. I need to tinker with it some more before I say anything concrete. On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Also, how does it play with --single-transaction. That was buried in our original report :) "BEGIN-COMMIT statements within the files cause warnings when the command is wrapped in a transaction with the -1 switch (as specified in the patch submission)" To expand upon that a bit: when psql encounters a file that contains a BEGIN statement, you get the expected "WARNING: there is already a transaction in progress" message. The COMMIT at the end of that file (assuming the user doesn't forget it) generates a COMMIT. Commands after that commit, or in any remaining files to be processed, are dealt with according to the user's autocommit settings: - if autocommit is ON, statements in the remaining files are processed & committed; the implicit COMMIT at the end of the whole thing then generates a "WARNING: there is no transaction in progress" message - if autocommit is OFF, statements in the remaining files generate "ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block" messages. > I would like multiple -c commands also, as well as a mix of -f and -c. > Can we add that at the same time please? I'll leave this one for someone else to answer. :) gabrielle