Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
From: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, rsmogura <rsmogura@softperience.eu>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-03-22T15:24:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Kevin Grittner > <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: >> Maybe the thing to focus on first is the oft-discussed "benchmark >> farm" (similar to the "build farm"), with a good mix of loads, so >> that the impact of changes can be better tracked for multiple >> workloads on a variety of platforms and configurations. Without >> something like that it is very hard to justify the added complexity >> of an idea like this in terms of the performance benefit gained. > > A related area that could use some looking at is why performance tops > out at shared_buffers ~8GB and starts to fall thereafter. Under what circumstances does this happen? Can a simple pgbench -S with a large scaling factor elicit this behavior? Cheers, Jeff