Re: pg_dump --split patch
David Wilson <david.t.wilson@gmail.com>
From: David Wilson <david.t.wilson@gmail.com>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2010-12-28T23:00:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
pg_dump: Output functions deterministically sorted
- 7b583b20b1c9 9.3.0 cited
-
When sorting functions in pg_dump, break ties (same name) by number of arguments
- 1acc06a1f4ae 9.0.0 cited
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com> wrote: > > I think you are right about functions (and aggregates) being the only > desc-type where two objects can share the same name in the same schema. > This means the problem of dumping objects in different order is a very > limited problem, only affecting overloaded functions. > > I didn't include the arguments in the file name, as it would lead to very > long file names unless truncated, and since the problem is very limited, I > think we shouldn't include it. It's cleaner with just the name part of the > tag in the file name. > Why not place all overloads of a function within the same file? Then, assuming you order them deterministically within that file, we sidestep the file naming issue and maintain useful diff capabilities, since a diff of the function's file will show additions or removals of various overloaded versions. -- - David T. Wilson david.t.wilson@gmail.com