Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add missing keywords to gram.y's unreserved_keywords list.

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>

Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, David Christensen <david@endpoint.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Date: 2011-03-15T15:42:14Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Add missing keywords to gram.y's unreserved_keywords list.
- 3f7d24da16d3 9.1.0 cited

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>>> SET VALID? (c.f. SET NULL).
>>
>> That sounds the best so far, but maybe we should think about other
>> phrases altogether (ie, not arising from the word "valid")?  I
>> don't have any great ideas offhand, just trying to think outside
>> the box.
>
> At the risk of adding yet another meaning to an
> already-heavily-worked word, ANALYZE?

Well, we don't seem to really have consensus around anything in
particular here.  Should we just leave it alone, or is this worth
spending more effort on?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company