Re: string function - "format" function proposal
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-09-06T15:05:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2010/9/6 Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> So? You'd need to quote the values anyway, in general. If you want >> something that will be valid SQL you'd better include the functionality >> of quote_literal() in it. >> >> I'm not sure that it's a good idea to have any type-specific special >> cases. > > As I remember, the original motivation of %v formatter is > some DBMSes don't like quoted numeric literals. However, > Postgres accepts quoted numerics, and we're developing Postgres. > > So, our consensus would be %v formatter should be removed > completely from the format function. > I think so tag that quotes all without numbers can be very useful, but it isn't too much important for me. I can live without them. Regards Pavel > -- > Itagaki Takahiro >