Re: Wildcard search support for pg_trgm
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-12T21:53:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Update contrib/pg_trgm for new GIN extractQuery API.
- be0c3ea2d30b 9.1.0 cited
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>wrote: > How different (and better) is it from wildspeed? > The general advantage is possibility of usage wildcard search and trigram similarity search using the same index. I expect that GIN trigram index is slightly less space demanding, but slightly slower on search than wildspeed. Also, I expect GiST trigram index to be slower on search, but faster on updates. While I didn't check these assumptions in details. I've lack of test datasets for sufficient testing, and I would like to ask community to help me with it. Because testing on dictionaries is good, but obviously not enough. ---- With best regards, Alexander Korotkov.