Horton

Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>

View thread
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-02-10T14:30:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Remove rare corner case for data loss when triggering standby server.

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 15:25, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 05:24, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I did s/failover/promote. Here is the updated patch.
>>>
>>> I rebased the patch to current git master.
>>
>> This patch looks fine to me.  I will mark it Ready for Committer.
>>
>> (Someone else please feel free to pick it up for the actual commit, if
>> you have cycles.)
>
> I see that the docs part of the patch removes the mentioning of
> reporting servers - is that intentional, or a mistake? Seems that
> usecase still remains, no?

Also, the patch no longer applies, since it conflicts with
faa0550572583f51dba25611ab0f1d1c31de559b.

Since you (Fujii-san) wrote both of them, feel like rebasing it
properly for current master?

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/