Horton

Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump

Marcin Mańk <marcin.mank@gmail.com>

View thread
From: marcin mank <marcin.mank@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-06T20:48:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> IIRC, in old discussions of this problem we first considered allowing
> clients to pull down an explicit representation of their snapshot (which
> actually is an existing feature now, txid_current_snapshot()) and then
> upload that again to become the active snapshot in another connection.

Could a hot standby use such a snapshot representation? I.e. same
snapshot on the master and the standby?

Greetings
Marcin Mańk