Re: Sync Rep Design
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@postgresql.org>, Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-12-31T14:13:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: >> What's weird about using the role name? That's our standard way of >> distinguishing between two or more users. Why invent something new? > > wel a user is not a host/server for me - given there is no real benefit from > using distinct roles for each standby yet I don't see why we should > complicate the replication setup procedure by requiring 1 role per standby. > So I'm all for giving each standby a name but please make it an explicit one > and not something that is only vaguely related to the actual standby host. OK. If that's the consensus, can someone post a patch? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company