Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-08-09T06:57:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- edit7.diff (text/x-patch) patch
Hello 2010/8/8 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: >> updated patch attached > > What exactly is the point of the \sf command? It seems like quite a lot > of added code for a feature that nobody has requested, and whose > definition is about as ad-hoc as could be. Personally I'd much sooner > use \ef for looking at a function definition. I think if \sf had been > submitted as a separate patch, rather than being snuck in with a feature > people do want, it wouldn't be accepted. > > The current patch doesn't even compile warning-free :-( > > command.c: In function `exec_command': > command.c:559: warning: `lineno' might be used uninitialized in this function > command.c: In function `editFile': > command.c:1729: warning: `editor_lineno_switch' might be used uninitialized in this function > This warnings depends on gcc version, probably :(. On new fedora I see nothing. So updated patch attached - these variables are initialised in declaration now. Regards Pavel Stehule > > regards, tom lane >