Re: Optimize PL/Perl function argument passing [PATCH]
Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>
From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Tim Bunce <Tim.Bunce@pobox.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-02-01T16:51:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:22, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > This looks pretty good. But why are we bothering to keep $prolog at all any > more, if all we're going to pass it is &PL_sv_no all the time? Maybe we'll > have a use for it in the future, but right now we don't appear to unless I'm > missing something. I don't see any reason to keep it around.