Re: sepgsql contrib module
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-01-21T15:50:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
pgindent run for 9.0, second run
- 239d769e7e05 9.0.0 cited
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> ALTER FUNCTION is supposed to cause plan invalidation in such a case. >>> Not sure if GRANT plays nice with that though. > >> And in the case of SE-Linux, this could get changed from outside the >> database. Not sure how to handle that. I guess we could just never >> inline anything, but that might be an overreaction. > > I think SELinux is just out of luck in that case. If it didn't refuse > execution permission at the time we checked before inlining (which we > do), it doesn't get to change its mind later. Seems reasonable to me, if it works for KaiGai. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company