Re: Extensions and custom_variable_classes
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-20T04:42:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >> Just to point out one concrete problem: the postmaster reads >> postgresql.conf too, so it would have to do this as well in order to >> parse postgresql.conf correctly. > > Well, if I parse you correctly, in my patch, it does. There's another > GUC array where to store invalid placeholders so that we can revisit > later. That even allows custom_variable_classes not to be parsed first > in the list, even if that's not put into use in the patch. I bet it doesn't. The *postmaster* never connects to a database, so which copy of pg_extension does it ever read? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company