Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
From: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
To: Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-17T00:39:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 16 February 2011 23:02, Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> writes: >> > BTW, you use the term 'fictitious' in the comments, would it be >> > better >> > to standardize the term used for such an index? So either the comment >> > would >> > be changed to call it hypothetical, or the structure member would be >> > changed >> > to isfictitious. >> >> Yeah, hypothetical is the more-established term I think. > > Please find the patch attached. For my benefit, could you explain how ishypothetical gets set to true? -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935