Horton

Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, fazool mein <fazoolmein@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, ganesh@vmware.com
Date: 2010-09-15T12:39:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:38 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
>> Now that the latch patch is in, when do you think you'll be able to use it
>> instead of the poll loop?
>
> Here is the updated version, which uses a latch in communication from
> walsender to backend. I've not changed the others. Because walsender
> already uses it in HEAD, and Heikki already proposed the patch which
> replaced the poll loop between walreceiver and startup process with
> a latch.

I rebased the patch against current HEAD because it conflicted with
recent commits about a latch.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center