Re: Include WAL in base backup
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-01-25T20:17:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- basebackup_wal.patch (text/x-patch) patch
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 16:34, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 15:04, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> (the discussed changse above have been applied and pushed to github) >>> >>> Thanks! I'll test and review that. >> >> WAL file might get recycled or removed while walsender is reading it. >> So the WAL file which pg_basebackup seemingly received successfully >> might be actually invalid. Shouldn't we need to check that what we read >> is valid as XLogRead does? We should, and the easiest way is to actually use XLogRead() since the code is already there. How about the way in this patch? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/