Re: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>
From: Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-28T22:35:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > What's needed here is for someone to write a good mrtg/rrd/whatever > replacement using postgres as its data store. If you're monitoring > something sensitive then you would store the data in a *different* > postgres server to avoid Tom's complaint. There may be aspects of the > job that Postgres does poorly but we can focus on improving those > parts of Postgres rather than looking for another database. And > frankly Postgres isn't that bad a tool for it -- when I did some > performance analysis recently I actually ended up loading the data > into Postgres so I could do some of the aggregations using window > functions anyways. > Greg, see https://labs.omniti.com/labs/reconnoiter, but also see Josh's nearby email about how he's trying to solve this internal to the database. Robert Treat play: xzilla.net work: omniti.com hiring: l42.org/Lg