Horton

Re: wrapping up this CommitFest (was Re: knngist - 0.8)

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-03-01T20:31:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Further refine patch for commenting operator implementation functions.

  2. Fix citext's upgrade-from-unpackaged script to set its collation correctly.

  3. Mark operator implementation functions as such in their comments.

  4. Add KNNGIST support to contrib/btree_gist.

  5. Fix plpython breakage detected on certain Fedora machines on buildfarm.

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 3/1/11 11:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If we do hold up the release, I'll probably go back and reopen the
>> postgresql_fdw patch as well as btree_gist.  So I won't run out of
>> things to do.  But I'm not terribly satisfied with the decision-making
>> process here.
>
> OK, well, we gave it an extra 15 days, which was all we promised.
>
> I'm ok with closing things as of the end of the 15 days, say Thursday or
> Friday.

That's still missing the point, which is that the code is unlikely to
be up to our usual standards at that point.

So far I don't hear anyone arguing strongly that we should accept sync
rep in 9.1, and several people arguing the reverse.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company