Re: .gitignore files, take two

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>

To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2010-09-21T20:13:13Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

gitignore.patch (text/x-patch) patch

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 22:11, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>> Do we know what the exact pattern would be for .sl and .dylib? Are
>>> they following the same basic pattern of .sl.<major>.<minor>?
>
>> Yes, they'll be just the same --- Makefile.shlib treats all those
>> extensions alike.
>
> I take that back.  Darwin does things differently, bless their pointy
> little heads:
>
>    DLSUFFIX            = .dylib
>    shlib               = lib$(NAME).$(SO_MAJOR_VERSION).$(SO_MINOR_VERSION)$(DLSUFFIX)
>
> So it looks like *.dylib is sufficient and we don't need anything with
> numbers afterwards for that variant.

Ok. Just to be clear, here's what I have now:

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/