Re: proof concept: do statement parametrization

2010/7/4 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>:
>
>
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW, we intentionally didn't put any provision for parameters into DO
>>> originally.  What's changed to alter that decision?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It just concept - nothing more. And my instinct speak so inline code
>> block without external parametrization is useless.
>>
>>
>>
>
> You have said this before, IIRC, but frankly your instinct is just wrong. It
> is no more useless than are parameter-less functions, and I use those
> frequently. I used a DO block for some useful testing just the other day.
>
> This whole proposal strikes me as premature. What we need is some experience
> from the field in using DO before we can sensibly decide how it should be
> extended. And we won't get that until 9.0 has been released and used for a
> while.
>

just we have different opinion

Regards

Pavel

> cheers
>
> andrew
>