Horton

Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?

Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>, Eric Davies <eric@barrodale.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-11-22T03:14:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:16, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> To have a chance of getting a significant portion
> of this into PostgreSQL 9.1, it really needs to be broken up into
> INDEPENDENTLY COMMITTABLE SUB-PATCHES.

Did we discuss about syntax-only patch is not acceptable because
it makes the head broken state at the previous commit-fest?
I think that's why the patch becomes so large.

So, our guideline to submit a large patch would be:
  * Split patch into commitable sub-patches (2000 lines each),
  * But submit a series of patches at once.

Am I understanding correctly?

-- 
Itagaki Takahiro