Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-08-26T21:58:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> wrote: > On 08/26/2010 09:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> Not having to have a hard limit on the space for unconsumed messages? > > Ah, I see. However, spilling to disk is unwanted for the current use cases > of imessages. Instead the sender needs to be able to deal with > out-of-(that-specific-part-of-shared)-memory conditions. Shared memory can be paged out, too, if it's not being used enough to keep the OS from deciding to evict it. And I/O to a mmap()'d file or shared memory region can remain in RAM. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company