Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Steve Singer <ssinger@ca.afilias.info>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca>, r t <pgsql@xzilla.net>
Date: 2010-12-09T20:59:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If the constraint name is not specified, we should certainly use
>> the existing index name, not randomly rename it.
>
> +1

+1

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company