Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Steve Singer <ssinger@ca.afilias.info>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca>, r t <pgsql@xzilla.net>
Date: 2010-12-09T20:59:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> If the constraint name is not specified, we should certainly use >> the existing index name, not randomly rename it. > > +1 +1 -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company