Re: system views for walsender activity

Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>

From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>

To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>

Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2011-01-07T13:09:35Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 21:48, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>>  * pg_stat_replication
>>  * pg_stat_standby (not yet)
>
> Just to keep the bikeshedding up, should it in this case not be
> pg_stat_replication_master and pg_stat_replication_standby or such?
> Replication applies to both master and slave...

The reason I didn't use term "master" is that pg_stat_replication is
information of *standby* servers on master server. Of course,
wal senders are processes in the master, but users probably think
they are the location standby servers receives.

I forgot to update SGML for the view. I'll do it soon.
Thanks for the heads-up.

-- 
Itagaki Takahiro