Horton

Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-07T03:51:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Fair enough. How about increasing the default to 10 seconds?
>> Since bgwriter has already using 10s as a nap time if there is no
>> configured activity, I think that 10s is non-nonsense default value.
>
> What do we get out of making this non-configurable?

Which would make the setting of replication simpler, I think.
But I agree to just increase the default value of wal_sender_delay
rather than dropping it.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center