Re: Replication logging

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-01-18T15:42:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:56, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>>> We should treat log_disconnections the same?
>>
>> We could keep it a boolean, but then only log disconnections for the
>> cases that are mentioned in log_connections?
>>
>> It doesn't make sense to log disconnection for a connection we didn't
>> log the connection for...
>
> Maybe true. But, at least for me, it's more intuitive to provide both as
> enum parameters.

Is there *any* usecase for setting them differently though? (other
than connections being <something> and disconnectoins being <none>?)
If not, aren't we just encouraging people to configure in a way that
makes no sense?

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/