Horton
Menu

Re: warning message in standby

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-06-14T14:13:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> It means that we can't prevent people from configuring their tools to
>>> ignore important warning. We can't prevent them rom ignoring ERROR or
>>> FATAL either...
>
>> My point is that most tools are going to look at the tag first to
>> determine the severity of the message, and might even have
>> log_min_messages set to ignore warnings.
>
> Why is this discussion based on the idea that we have to cater to
> incorrectly written log-filtering apps?
>
> The correct log level for this message is LOG.  End of discussion.

Why?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company