Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Date: 2010-07-02T17:07:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:36 PM, David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> wrote: > On Jun 28, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> While I would personally prefer to have an operator for the slicing >>> opeeration, I'm not willing to spend time arguing about it. So, +1 to >>> implement the subset operation as the function slice(), and defer having >>> an operator until later. >> >> Yeah, I think the consensus is to avoid picking an operator name at all. >> "slice()" is OK by me. > > Will this be done for Beta 3? You forgot to attach the patch. :-) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company