Thread

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts.

  1. pgsql: Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts.

    Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> — 2010-12-17T13:34:32Z

    Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts.
    
    This prevents the word "waiting" from briefly disappearing from the ps
    status line when ResolveRecoveryConflictWithVirtualXIDs begins a new
    iteration of the outer loop.
    
    Along the way, remove some useless pgstat_report_waiting() calls;
    the startup process doesn't appear in pg_stat_activity.
    
    Fujii Masao
    
    Branch
    ------
    master
    
    Details
    -------
    http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=611fed371227f430e71d0ff7fed037f1006b410d
    
    Modified Files
    --------------
    src/backend/storage/ipc/standby.c |   30 +++++++++++++-----------------
    1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
    
    
  2. Re: pgsql: Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts.

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2010-12-17T14:52:04Z

    Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> writes:
    > Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts.
    > This prevents the word "waiting" from briefly disappearing from the ps
    > status line when ResolveRecoveryConflictWithVirtualXIDs begins a new
    > iteration of the outer loop.
    
    I imagine the reason for the original coding was to avoid a useless
    gettimeofday kernel call in the common case that there are no
    conflicting xacts to wait for.  Could we restore that behavior?
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
  3. Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts.

    Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2010-12-17T16:13:51Z

    On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
    > Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> writes:
    >> Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts.
    >> This prevents the word "waiting" from briefly disappearing from the ps
    >> status line when ResolveRecoveryConflictWithVirtualXIDs begins a new
    >> iteration of the outer loop.
    >
    > I imagine the reason for the original coding was to avoid a useless
    > gettimeofday kernel call in the common case that there are no
    > conflicting xacts to wait for.  Could we restore that behavior?
    
    Something like the attached?
    
    -- 
    Robert Haas
    EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
    The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
    
  4. Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts.

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2010-12-17T16:20:27Z

    Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
    > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
    >> I imagine the reason for the original coding was to avoid a useless
    >> gettimeofday kernel call in the common case that there are no
    >> conflicting xacts to wait for. Could we restore that behavior?
    
    > Something like the attached?
    
    I would just add the return-at-the-top.  Changing the loop logic is
    not necessary --- the loop test is cheap.
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
  5. Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts.

    Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2010-12-17T16:34:48Z

    On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
    > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
    >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
    >>> I imagine the reason for the original coding was to avoid a useless
    >>> gettimeofday kernel call in the common case that there are no
    >>> conflicting xacts to wait for.  Could we restore that behavior?
    >
    >> Something like the attached?
    >
    > I would just add the return-at-the-top.  Changing the loop logic is
    > not necessary --- the loop test is cheap.
    
    Hmm... that's a fine bit of hairsplitting, but OK.
    
    Done that way, then.
    
    -- 
    Robert Haas
    EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
    The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company