Re: knngist - 0.8
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-28T19:27:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>>> Since no one has stepped up to fix these issues, I have marked this >>>> patch Returned with Feedback. > >>> This is just contrib/btree_GIST, yes? > >> Yes, core KNN was committed by Tom during the November CommitFest. > > Right. However, it's disappointing that this isn't in, because the > number of use cases for KNN-gist in core isn't very large. We really > need support for KNN in btree_gist to make it useful. > > Given that it is a contrib module, I personally wouldn't object to it > getting patched later, like during alpha or beta. But somebody's got > to do the work, and I've got a dozen higher-priority problems right now. Well, we can argue about whether it's too late for 9.1 if and when a patch shows up. Right now we don't have that problem. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company