Horton
Menu

Re: warning message in standby

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-06-14T15:14:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> Should I be downgrading Hot Standby breakages to LOG? That will
>> certainly help high availability as well.
>
> If a message is being issued in a non-user-connected session, there
> is basically not a lot of point in WARNING or below.  It should either
> be LOG, or ERROR/FATAL/PANIC (which are probably all about the same
> thing in the startup process...)

I think Simon's point here is the same as mine - LOG isn't too high -
it's too low.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company