Re: pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-04-30T17:53:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> > Tom Lane wrote: >> >> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> >> > Tom Lane wrote: >> >> >> If you aren't archiving then there's no guarantee that you'll still have >> >> >> a continuous WAL series starting from the start of the backup. >> >> >> >> > I wasn't really thinking of this use case, but you could set >> >> > wal_keep_segments "high enough". >> >> >> >> Ah. ?Okay, that seems like a workable approach, at least for people with >> >> reasonably predictable WAL loads. ?We could certainly improve on it >> >> later to make it more bulletproof, but it's usable now --- if we relax >> >> the error checks. >> >> >> >> (wal_keep_segments can be changed without restarting, right?) >> > >> > Should we allow -1 to mean "keep all segments"? >> >> If that's what you want to do, use archive_mode. > > Uh, I assume that will require me to store the WAL files somewhere else, > rather than keeping them in /pg_xlog, which I thought was the goal. Am > I missing something? Well, one of us is. Why would you want to retain all of your WAL logs in pg_xlog forever? ...Robert