Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+
Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
From: Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-11-05T19:52:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 21:20, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> writes: >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 20:13, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> If open_dsync is so bad for performance on Linux, maybe it's bad >>> everywhere? Should we be rethinking the default preference order? > >> So I think we should aim to fix old versions first. Do you disagree? > > What's that got to do with it? I'm not sure what you're asking. Surely changing the default wal_sync_method for all OSes in maintenance releases is out of the question, no? Regards, Marti